A Century of Chinese Cinema runs at BFI Southbank from June-October 2014.
All titles in bold will be screening in the season.
This feature appears courtesy of the Toronto International Film Festival.
A Century of Chinese Cinema. It’s a daunting title for a cultural project, and one appropriately subject to skepticism. The doubts begin with the first ‘C’, for ‘Century’. Not only are there several possible dates to use as a starting point for any centenary (especially a milestone like this), but much of the early history of Chinese cinema is utterly lost to us, even more so than that of other cinemas. Yet even though hundreds of the earliest Chinese films were swallowed up in the social and political chaos that engulfed China in the first decades of the 20th century, those invaluable films that remain give evidence that Chinese cinema could provide not only a much-needed escape for the country’s beleaguered citizenry, but a tentative vision of a new society freed of both stultifying tradition and anarchic terror.
Now to the second questionable ‘C’: ‘Chinese’. Due to conflicts of various kinds, filmmaking in east Asia has been multipolar in the extreme, producing numerous significant production centres that defy the film-historical myth of a unified ‘national cinema’ focused on a single location. For this reason, critics and scholars have tended to isolate major centres of Chinese filmmaking – namely the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan – and champion these as distinct national cinemas.
While there is a great degree of logic to this approach, it is difficult to deny that the films made in these different places share much common ground, culturally, aesthetically, and philosophically. Furthermore, recent scholarship has done much to reveal the remarkably fluid movement of Chinese filmmakers between these three regions, from cinema’s very beginnings to the present day. It is this rich, complex and continuing inter-/intra-cinematic dialogue between these three regions – changing, evolving, rupturing and reforming over the course of a century – that this four-month programme explores.
And now for that final “C”: “Cinema” itself. As the ways in which films are created, distributed and viewed continue to change with astonishing speed, the very definition of ‘cinema’ itself has been called into question, with visual arts, gaming, and multiple other forms stretching the boundaries of moving-image culture.
We are keenly aware that, no matter its scope, this series could have taken several alternate and equally valid forms. Chinese cinema is rich beyond belief, and at least twice this many films could have been included in such a survey. We have aimed to achieve a balance between the canonical and the unjustly neglected, the historically vital and the thematically intriguing, and we have tried to cover as wide a spectrum of the key genres as possible.
Just as we seek to trace a dialogue between cinema traditions, our series is designed to encourage discussion, not close it down. And even though the very notion of positing films from these three regions as a unitary cultural enterprise is an inherently controversial one, we regard this programme as an opportunity to both discover those elements they share and explore potential new pathways of scholarship and cinematic discovery.
The golden age
The Golden Age runs at BFI Southbank in June 2014.
is rereleased nationwide from 20 June.
The 1930s in Shanghai were a golden age in many spheres of Chinese culture, cinema chief among them. Widely considered by the rest of the country as a den of iniquity, catering to foreign invaders walled off in concessions throughout the city, Shanghai presented an ‘anything goes’ attitude that proved enormously fruitful for the upstart new medium.
Despite heavy censorship by the Guomindang (Nationalist) government, Shanghai filmmaking during this period – aided considerably by the Chinese Communist Party cadres who infiltrated the growing studio system – was able to shatter age-old taboos and champion utopian ideals. Early masterpieces such as The Highway (1934) and Street Angel (1937) not only look towards a more just and equal society, but question how the art of cinema itself might be reconceived along progressive lines by experimenting with innovative visual techniques and unusual narrative structures.
The unquestioned symbol of 30s Shanghai filmmaking was Ruan Lingyu, the Garbo of Chinese cinema, who became the industry’s biggest star with her performances in such classics as The Goddess (1934) and New Women (1935) before tragically taking her own life at the age of 24.
Not only did Ruan’s outsized screen presence pave the way for a Chinese cinema that would largely be dominated by major female stars, but she helped make women in cinema emblematic of the larger progressive struggles then taking place. Both Nationalists and Communists viewed the liberation of women from the barbaric practices of the imperial era as a necessary component of a modern, 20th-century China. Furthermore, female characters are prominent presences in the literature of the progressive, western-oriented May 4th Movement, whose works and authors figured largely in golden age Shanghai cinema and well into the post-1949 era.
The other major influence on the cinema of the golden age was another, considerably more dire struggle. Following numerous incursions into China by Japanese armies from the start of the 1930s, the Sino-Japanese War broke out in earnest in 1937 and led straight into the carnage of the Second World War – over a decade of traumatic conflict that cut China in half, filled its cities with starving refugees, and resulted in the deaths of as many as 20 million Chinese. Several of the key films of this period naturally take the war and its aftermath as its subject, from the 1947 two-part epic The Spring River Flows East (regarded as China’s Gone with the Wind) to the crowning achievement of the golden age: Fei Mu’s 1948 masterpiece Spring in a Small Town, considered by many critics as the finest Chinese film ever and one of the greatest films of all time.
A new China
A New China runs at BFI Southbank in June 2014.
The victory of the Chinese Communist Party over the Nationalist forces in 1949 marked the end of the long Chinese civil war and the birth of a radically different nation. Yet despite the vast and far-reaching changes effected throughout all spheres of Chinese society by the ideological imperatives of the new regime, it is intriguing to trace the continuities between the cinemas of the pre- and post-Revolution periods. Despite the state-sanctioned dictates of socialist realism, many of the most critically and commercially successful Mainland films up to the Cultural Revolution continued to derive from the acknowledged classics of Chinese progressive culture associated with the prewar May 4th Movement.
Meanwhile, brief periods of cultural experimentation such as the Hundred Flowers Campaign emboldened filmmakers to once again engage in social commentary and take both political and aesthetic risks, leading to such recently rediscovered masterworks as Lu Ban’s extraordinary An Unfinished Comedy (1957). This intriguing period would come to an end with the onset of the Cultural Revolution, the last and most brutal crackdown on intellectuals, which halted narrative film production for more than a decade.
The 1949 Revolution would have an enormous impact on the cinemas of the other territories as well. In Hong Kong, where the British officials who ruled the colony were wary of films that might stir up social conflict, the commercial cinema of Hong Kong kept the progressive spirit of the golden age alive by using the frameworks of popular entertainment to address social issues in such powerful melodramas as Parents’ Hearts (1955) and In the Face of Demolition (1953). In Taiwan, meanwhile, where the defeated Nationalist forces had taken refuge and instituted a form of martial law – which included cinematic censorship under the banner of ‘healthy realism’, the Guomindang correlative to the Mainland’s socialist realism – political commentary nevertheless found its way back into cinema, under the guise of historical drama or as subplots in romantic melodramas. And as before, progressive sentiments in Chinese cinema went hand in hand with the presence of strong female characters, in such gentle realist dramas as Li Hanxiang’s wonderful The Winter (1969).
Swordsmen, Gangsters and Ghosts – The Evolution of Chinese Genre Cinema runs at BFI Southbank in July 2014.
First emerging near the end of the 1920s, the wildly popular martial-arts films (known as wuxia pian, literally ‘chivalrous combat films’) quickly became a target of official sanction. The Guomindang (Nationalist) government, taking umbrage at the films’ outré special effects and bevy of louche women, banned them for promoting “superstition and moral decadence”. After 1949, the Communists would continue this policy for much the reason, claiming that the films promoted the worst aspects of feudal China.
In the late 1940s, with anti-wuxia policies in place both on the Communist Mainland and Guomindang-controlled Taiwan, talent from both the world of filmmaking and that of the martial-arts schools began a migration to Hong Kong, where the genre revived in the late 1940s with the fantastically popular series of films based on the life of the real-life martial-arts guru Wong Fei-hung. While the swordplay-focused wuxia film reached its peak in the mid-60s to the mid-70s with the luxurious productions of Chang Cheh and King Hu, it would be an offshoot of wuxia that would bring the martial-arts film to the world: the unarmed combat-based kung-fu genre, which found its global figurehead in the one and only Bruce Lee.
The 80s and 90s saw several major evolutions in the genre as the craze for the ‘classic’ martial-arts film began to wane. Jackie Chan found global superstardom as the clown prince of kung fu, blending the often solemn martial-arts template with slapstick and sensational stunts; prolific Hong Kong New Wave leader Tsui Hark would take the wuxia film into a lavish new era with a series of ambitious epics; while the enormously influential, Hark-produced A Chinese Ghost Story (1987) brought fantasy and the supernatural into the martial-arts mix. Finally, at the turn of the century, martial-arts cinema returned to the Mainland that once spurned it: following Ang Lee’s global success with Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), a series of baroque, Mainland-produced wuxia epics such as Zhang Yimou’s Hero (2002) and Feng Xiaogang’s The Banquet (2006) garnered significant domestic and international success.
Concurrent with and intrinsically related to the rise of the wuxia and kung-fu genres were the Hong Kong gangster and crime thrillers, which refracted the martial-arts films’ themes of loyalty, brotherhood and patriotism through a dark, distorting lens. Originating in Hong Kong’s socially progressive cinema in the mid- to late-1960s, the genre began to evolve in a considerably more nihilistic and hyperbolic direction in the 1980s. Johnny Mak’s startlingly bleak Long Arm of the Law (1984) laid the groundwork for the gangster-film renaissance that blossomed with John Woo’s A Better Tomorrow (1986), which made ‘heroic bloodshed’ the new byword of Hong Kong action cinema with its outrageously stylised, over-the-top gun battles. Subsequently, several other innovative directors would take the genre to exciting new places: Andrew Lau and Alan Mak reinvigorated Hong Kong cinema as a whole with their 2002 hit Infernal Affairs, while the great Johnnie To took a considerably more cynical and sardonic look at Woo-style blood-brothering in a series of hard-edged crime films that culminated in his 2005 diptych Election and Election 2.
New Waves runs at BFI Southbank in August 2014.
The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution looms as large in Chinese memory as the traumatic experience of the war years. Launched in 1966, the Cultural Revolution paralysed cultural and intellectual life and violently uprooted society in both the cities and the countryside: swarms of militant young Red Guards attacked or publicly humiliated their ‘backwards’ elders and destroyed artefacts of China’s historical and religious heritage, while the military, the factories, and even the Communist Party itself were subjected to systematic purges. As with all the other arts, cinema was profoundly affected by the ravages of the Cultural Revolution: film production was stopped altogether for a time, and only gradually restarted with an exclusive output of ideologically orthodox model operas.
As the Mainland finally emerged from the shadow of this cataclysmic event a decade later, the filmmakers who became known as the Fourth Generation – a pre-Cultural Revolution cohort, many of whom had themselves been denounced, ‘re-educated’ and forced to endure the ridicule of young militants for their commitment to culture life – sought for ways to express the ordeal that had been visited upon the country. The result was the so-called ‘scar films’, simple, affecting dramas that employ intimate and small-scale narratives focusing on individual tragedies as microcosmic representations of massive societal trauma – a style of storytelling that would prove remarkably influential even beyond the context of the Cultural Revolution.
Some of the Fourth Generation’s most notable figures, such as Xie Fei and Wu Tianming, also served as mentors to the leading lights of the Fifth Generation, who had been the first students admitted to the Beijing Film Academy following the end of the Cultural Revolution. Marked by radical aesthetic experimentation, boldly emotive performances, and complex and critical thinking about the events leading up to and following the 1949 Revolution, such celebrated films as Chen Kaige’s Yellow Earth (1984), Zhang Yimou’s Red Sorghum (1987), and Tian Zhuangzhuang’s The Horse Thief (1986) came to represent a definitive break with preceding Mainland cinema, while their dazzling play with colour and striking, often symbolic use of landscape endowed them with an epic dimension that brought Chinese cinema to the forefront of the international art-house circuit.
As these radical changes in cinematic culture took place on the Mainland, much was changing in the other regions as well. The Hong Kong New Wave – characterised by the tough-minded social realism of Ann Hui and the wildly inventive genre revisionism/extremism of Tsui Hark – challenged the predictable, studio-bound commercial Hong Kong film industry with a combination of boundary-pushing content, local specificity and outré stylisation that both alienated and galvanised local audiences.
In Taiwan, where the strict Guomindang censorship that had existed for decades gradually eased as the regime’s strength waned, the emergence of Hou Hsiao-hsien and Edward Yang marked the arrival of a new generation of art-house masters.
Though markedly different in many ways, the roughly simultaneous cinematic renaissances that occurred in Hong Kong and Taiwan share some powerful links with the emergence of the Fourth and Fifth Generation filmmakers on the Mainland. Whether through intimate character study (The Women from the Lake of Scented Souls, 1993), flamboyant spectacle (Farewell My Concubine, 1993), art-house rigour (A City of Sadness, 1989) or displaced allegory (Boat People, 1982), the weight of history is keenly felt in the films that emerged from all these assorted New Waves.
Furthermore, continuing a pattern that can be seen throughout the history of Chinese cinema in all three regions, it is notable how these new cinematic movements have foregrounded female characters, as well as the actresses who play them. Most notably, Gong Li (from the Mainland), Brigitte Lin (a native of Taiwan) and the Hong Kong-born Maggie Cheung (soon to be a fixture of the Hong Kong Second Wave) would capture the imagination of audiences much as the great Ruan Lingyu did in her day, and would help bring Chinese cinema to both new heights of achievement and new levels of international recognition and success.
New Directions runs at BFI Southbank from September-October 2014.
After the terror and violence that had dominated the Chinese experience of the 20th century, that century’s end – marked by the Mainland’s rise to global economic pre-eminence, the surprisingly smooth return of Hong Kong to the Mainland as a Special Administrative Region, and the reinstitution of democratic debate in Taiwan following decades of authoritarian Guomindang rule – felt comparatively optimistic.
Yet this serenity also carried a strange, indefinable uncertainty about it, creating a kind of apprehensive malaise that would be both reflected in and expressed by an increasingly more diffuse Chinese cinema. As overt political, cultural and generational conflict appeared to recede, the collective consciousness that had bound the previous Generations and New Waves together began to disperse, allowing for more distinctly individualistic, stylistically eclectic and globally-oriented filmmakers to come to the fore.
Nevertheless, even as those Mainland filmmakers who comprised the so-called Sixth Generation – Wang Xiaoshuai and Jia Zhangke chief among them – rejected that label and went to great lengths to deny any shared approach to cinema, their films still display some marked group characteristics: an increased cosmopolitanism, a preoccupation with urban life that has much in common with the Hong Kong New Wave, a predilection for exquisite compositions and gentle pacing that owes much to Taiwan’s Hou Hsiao-hsien, and a taste for small-scale, delicately wrought narratives of ordinary people buffeted by vast social change that rhymes with the Fourth Generation ‘scar’ films and rejects the largesse (some would say excess) of the flamboyant Fifth Generation epics.
In Hong Kong, the Second Wave that appeared at the end of the 1980s took the opposite approach to the Sixth Generation’s carefully studied minimalism. Led by Wong Kar-wai and Stanley Kwan, the Second Wavers created impossibly lush, superbly stylised films that introduced a powerful new art-film aesthetic to international cinema, one that seemed to speak to the anxiety, velocity and instability of contemporary urban existence. Wong’s Chungking Express (1994) in particular – in its bold experimentation with editing and framing, fragmentary narrative construction, and woozily beautiful camerawork by Christopher Doyle – has been singled out by critics and academics as an encapsulation of the ‘postmodern’ in both its style and subject.
Wong’s supercharged flânerie evident assumes a more slothful, deadpan comic aspect in the work of Tsai Ming-liang, the most important and exciting new filmmaker to emerge from Taiwan at the turn of the century. Both strangely otherworldly and remarkably insightful in their oblique social criticism, Tsai’s absurdist reveries transpose the breathless speed of Wong’s money-fuelled Hong Kong to Taipei and slows it down to a mesmerising crawl.
The rootlessness evinced by Wong’s lovelorn romantics and Tsai’s opaquely yearning drifters is also mirrored in the wandering protagonists of the films of many Mainland directors: the bohemian artists of Wang Xiaoshuai’s The Days (1993), the travelling players of Jia Zhangke’s Platform (2000), and even the bumbling rural cop of Lu Chuan’s debut feature The Missing Gun (2002).
Yet even as the latter film marked the emergence of an edgy new style in Mainland cinema that emulated the technical flash and dazzle of Hollywood, its director brilliantly demonstrated with his second film Kekexili: Mountain Patrol (2004) – a gritty survival epic that questions and repositions the Fifth Generation’s veneration of landscape – that complex dialogue with the past, combined with an ambitious attempt to remake cinematic language, that has been the hallmark of this extraordinary century of Chinese cinema.